SAMYA SETT versus SHAMBU SARKAR AND ANR.

SAMYA SETT versus SHAMBU SARKAR AND ANR.

The High Court's remarks and strictures against the appellant were improper, uncalled for and unwarranted; they were unnecessary for deciding the controversy and not justified, hence directed to be deleted.

Parties
Appellant: Samya Sett; Respondent: Shambu Sarkar; Respondent: Registrar General of High Court of Calcutta
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
12 August 2005
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against High Court Order
Outcome
Appeal allowed to the extent indicated
Legal Topics
Strictures by Courts, Judicial Discipline, Default Bail, Remarks Against Judicial Officers, Recall of Bail Order
Criminal Law Strictures by Courts Judicial Discipline Default Bail Remarks Against Judicial Officers Recall of Bail Order

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 6 Authorities cited 11 Party arguments 1 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Samya Sett

Appellant

Shambu Sarkar

Respondent

Registrar General of High Court of Calcutta

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against High Court Order

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether strictures and remarks passed by High Court against the appellant judge were justified

Ratio Decidendi

The High Court's remarks and strictures against the appellant were improper, uncalled for and unwarranted; they were unnecessary for deciding the controversy and not justified, hence directed to be deleted.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed to the extent indicated

Orders

  • Deletion of remarks and strictures passed by High Court against appellant judge