SANGAM SPINNERS versus REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER-I
The appellant factory is entitled to infancy protection for three years from the date of set up, irrespective of the repeal of the provision, because the repeal did not indicate an intention to affect accrued rights, and statutory interpretation principles require statutes to be prospective unless expressly stated otherwise.
- Parties
- Appellant: Sangam Spinners; Respondent: Regional Provident Fund Commissioner-I
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 04 December 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Employees' Provident Fund Act, Infancy Protection, Retrospective Operation of Statutes, Repeal and Accrued Rights
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Sangam Spinners
Appellant
Regional Provident Fund Commissioner-I
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant factory is entitled to infancy protection for the full three years despite repeal of s.16(1)(d) of the Employees Provident Funds Act, 1952 with retrospective effect.
- 2 What is the effect of the omission of the exemption provision on accrued rights under the repealed statute?
Ratio Decidendi
The appellant factory is entitled to infancy protection for three years from the date of set up, irrespective of the repeal of the provision, because the repeal did not indicate an intention to affect accrued rights, and statutory interpretation principles require statutes to be prospective unless expressly stated otherwise.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Judgments of the Commissioner and High Court set aside
- Appellant entitled to protection for the period of three years starting from the date of establishment irrespective of repeal
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment