SANJAY CHANDRA versus CBI
The seriousness of the charge and magnitude of the alleged economic offence do not by themselves justify denial of bail where the investigation is complete, charge sheet filed, there is no substantial risk of tampering or interference with witnesses, and pre-trial detention is likely to exceed punishment if convicted, thus violating Article 21; accordingly, bail should be granted pending trial subject to stringent conditions.
- Parties
- Appellant: Sanjay Chandra; Respondent: CBI
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 23 November 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Refusal of Bail by Special Judge, CBI and Single Judge of High Court
- Outcome
- Appeals allowed; bail granted.
- Legal Topics
- Bail, Personal Liberty, Article 21 Right to Life and Personal Liberty, Economic Offences
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Sanjay Chandra
Appellant
CBI
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Refusal of Bail by Special Judge, CBI and Single Judge of High Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether bail should be granted to the appellants accused of economic offences causing alleged huge loss to the State exchequer, pending trial, when investigation is complete and there is no serious contention of tampering or interference with the trial.
Ratio Decidendi
The seriousness of the charge and magnitude of the alleged economic offence do not by themselves justify denial of bail where the investigation is complete, charge sheet filed, there is no substantial risk of tampering or interference with witnesses, and pre-trial detention is likely to exceed punishment if convicted, thus violating Article 21; accordingly, bail should be granted pending trial subject to stringent conditions.
Court Disposition
Appeals allowed; bail granted.
Orders
- Appellants to be released on bail pending trial, on executing a bond with two solvent sureties each in the sum of Rs. 5 lakhs to the satisfaction of the Special Judge, CBI, New Delhi.
- Appellants not to make any inducement, threat or promise to persons acquainted with facts of the case.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment