SANKAR PADAM THAPA versus VIJAYKUMAR DINESHCHANDRA AGARWAL
A Trust is not a juristic person capable of suing or being sued in its own name for the purposes considered; only trustees operate and are liable for acts of the trust, and therefore a complaint under the NI Act is maintainable against the trustee/chairman who signed the cheque without the necessity of making the Trust an accused.
- Parties
- Appellant: Sankar Padam Thapa; Respondent: Vijaykumar Dineshchandra Agarwal
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 09 October 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal to Supreme Court Against High Court Judgment Quashing Criminal Complaint Under the Negotiable Instruments Act
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; Impugned High Court judgment quashed and set aside
- Legal Topics
- Maintainability of Complaint Under NI Act Against Trustee, Whether a Trust Is a Juristic Person or Capable of Suing or Being Sued, Vicarious Liability Under Section 141, NI Act, Joinder of Necessary Parties in NI Act Complaint, Liability of Signatory of Dishonoured Cheque
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Sankar Padam Thapa
Appellant
Vijaykumar Dineshchandra Agarwal
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal to Supreme Court Against High Court Judgment Quashing Criminal Complaint Under the Negotiable Instruments Act
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a complaint under the NI Act is maintainable against the chairman/trustee when the trust has not been made an accused
- 2 Whether a trust can sue or be sued / is a trust a juristic person for purposes of NI Act
Ratio Decidendi
A Trust is not a juristic person capable of suing or being sued in its own name for the purposes considered; only trustees operate and are liable for acts of the trust, and therefore a complaint under the NI Act is maintainable against the trustee/chairman who signed the cheque without the necessity of making the Trust an accused.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; Impugned High Court judgment quashed and set aside
Orders
- Impugned Judgment dated 21.11.2022 quashed and set aside
- Criminal Case No.44(S)/2019 restored to the Trial Court file and number to proceed in accordance with law, with directions to take steps with due expedition
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment