SANSAR CHAND ATRI versus STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANR.

SANSAR CHAND ATRI versus STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANR.

A person in the Army who has earned pension after performing the requisite period of service, whether leaving at his own request or being released by the employer, must be treated as an ex-serviceman for the purpose of reservation. Exclusion of such a person is arbitrary and discriminatory, defeating the objective of reservation.

Parties
Appellant: Sansar Chand Atri; Respondent: State of Punjab; Respondent: Punjab Public Service Commission
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
02 April 2002
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Dismissal of Writ Petition by Punjab and Haryana High Court
Outcome
Appeal allowed; High Court judgment set aside.
Legal Topics
Reservation, Interpretation of Statutes, Equality Under Article 14, Definition of 'ex Servicemen'

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Sansar Chand Atri

Appellant

State of Punjab

Respondent

Punjab Public Service Commission

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal From Dismissal of Writ Petition by Punjab and Haryana High Court

  1. 1 Whether a person discharged from the Army at his own request after earning pension is an ex-serviceman for purposes of reservation under Punjab Recruitment of Ex-servicemen Rules, 1982

Ratio Decidendi

A person in the Army who has earned pension after performing the requisite period of service, whether leaving at his own request or being released by the employer, must be treated as an ex-serviceman for the purpose of reservation. Exclusion of such a person is arbitrary and discriminatory, defeating the objective of reservation.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed; High Court judgment set aside.

Orders

  • Respondents to declare results of appellants in competitive examination forthwith and consider their case for appointment as per service rules and law.
  • No order as to costs.