SMT. SARABATI DEVI. & ANR. versus SMT. USHA DEVI
Nomination under Section 39 of the Insurance Act, 1938 does not result in conferral of beneficial interest on the nominee; the nominee is simply authorized to receive the amount, which remains property of the estate and is subject to law of succession. The nominee cannot exclude the true heirs from inheriting proceeds.
- Parties
- Appellant: Sarbati Devi; Appellant: Alok Kumar (minor) represented by Atma Ram; Respondent: Usha Devi
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 06 December 1983
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Appellate Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Nomination in Life Insurance, Intestate Succession, Beneficial Interest in Insurance Policy
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Sarbati Devi
Appellant
Alok Kumar (minor) represented by Atma Ram
Appellant
Usha Devi
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Appellate Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Does a nominee under Section 39 of the Insurance Act, 1938 acquire beneficial interest in the proceeds of a life insurance policy to the exclusion of the heirs on the death of the assured, who died intestate?
Ratio Decidendi
Nomination under Section 39 of the Insurance Act, 1938 does not result in conferral of beneficial interest on the nominee; the nominee is simply authorized to receive the amount, which remains property of the estate and is subject to law of succession. The nominee cannot exclude the true heirs from inheriting proceeds.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Judgments and decrees of lower courts set aside
- Plaintiffs each entitled to 1/3 share in the amount received under the insurance policies and the interest earned by its investment
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment