SARDAR GURMEJ SINGH versus SARDAR PARTAP SINGH KAIRON
Lambardars are not persons falling within clause (f) of section 123(7) of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 (they are excluded as village revenue officers) and accordingly the respondent did not commit a corrupt practice by appointing lambardars as his polling and counting agents.
- Parties
- Appellant: Sardar Gurmej Singh; Respondent: Sardar Partap Singh Kairon
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 30 September 1959
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal by Special Leave From the Judgment and Order of the Punjab High Court Dated 12 March 1959
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Corrupt Practice Under S.123(7)(f) of the Representation of the People Act, 1951, Status of Lambardars, Distinction Between Revenue Officers and Village Accountants, Interpretation of Inclusive and Excluding Clauses
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Sardar Gurmej Singh
Appellant
Sardar Partap Singh Kairon
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal by Special Leave From the Judgment and Order of the Punjab High Court Dated 12 March 1959
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether appointing lambardars as polling and counting agents constitutes a corrupt practice under s.123(7)(f) of the Representation of the People Act, 1951
- 2 Whether lambardars are revenue officers or village accountants within the meaning of s.123(7)(f) of the Representation of the People Act, 1951
Ratio Decidendi
Lambardars are not persons falling within clause (f) of section 123(7) of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 (they are excluded as village revenue officers) and accordingly the respondent did not commit a corrupt practice by appointing lambardars as his polling and counting agents.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed with costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment