SARVA SHRAMIK SANGH versus INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LTD. & ORS.
Since the issues, parties, and reliefs claimed in the two writ petitions were different, the principle of res judicata or estoppel does not bar the appellant from seeking alternate reliefs. The Central Government's refusal to refer the dispute to the Tribunal was an unwarranted adjudication of the merits of the dispute and must be reconsidered.
- Parties
- Appellant: Sarva Shramik Sangh; Respondents: Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. & Ors.
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 13 April 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal From Bombay High Court Judgment Dated 19.08.2006 in Writ Petition No. 1673 of 2005
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Res Judicata, Estoppel, Contract Labour, Industrial Disputes, Reference to Industrial Tribunal, Canteen Workers, Mandamus
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Sarva Shramik Sangh
Appellant
Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. & Ors.
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal From Bombay High Court Judgment Dated 19.08.2006 in Writ Petition No. 1673 of 2005
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether appellant was estopped from taking a different stand in subsequent writ petition after dismissal of first writ petition
- 2 Whether the Central Government's refusal to make reference under s.10(1) of Industrial Disputes Act required interference
Ratio Decidendi
Since the issues, parties, and reliefs claimed in the two writ petitions were different, the principle of res judicata or estoppel does not bar the appellant from seeking alternate reliefs. The Central Government's refusal to refer the dispute to the Tribunal was an unwarranted adjudication of the merits of the dispute and must be reconsidered.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Central Government directed to reconsider the request for reference of the dispute to the Industrial adjudicator.
- Industrial Tribunal to consider dispute on merits, uninfluenced by observations of High Court or Supreme Court.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment