SARWAN SINGH & ANR. versus KASTURI LAL
Sections 14A and Chapter IIIA of the Delhi Rent Control Act override ss. 19 and 39 of the Slum Areas Act. The landlord's right to immediate possession under s. 14A prevails, and no permission of the competent authority under the Slum Clearance Act is required before instituting eviction proceedings under the special summary procedure. Later legislation with explicit overriding provisions must be given effect, and the object and purpose support this construction.
- Parties
- Appellant: Sarwan Singh; Respondent: Kasturi Lal
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 14 December 1976
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal by Special Leave From Judgment and Order Dated 6th September, 1976 of the Delhi High Court in C. R. No. 390/76
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Non Obstante Clauses, Priority Among Statutes, Eviction of Tenants in Slum Areas, Summary Procedure for Eviction, Government Accommodation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Sarwan Singh
Appellant
Kasturi Lal
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal by Special Leave From Judgment and Order Dated 6th September, 1976 of the Delhi High Court in C. R. No. 390/76
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the provisions of the Slum Areas (Improvement and Clearance) Act, 1956 override those of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 regarding eviction of tenants.
- 2 Whether landlord entitled to immediate possession under s. 14A of Delhi Rent Act must obtain permission under s. 19 of the Slum Clearance Act before instituting eviction proceedings.
Ratio Decidendi
Sections 14A and Chapter IIIA of the Delhi Rent Control Act override ss. 19 and 39 of the Slum Areas Act. The landlord's right to immediate possession under s. 14A prevails, and no permission of the competent authority under the Slum Clearance Act is required before instituting eviction proceedings under the special summary procedure. Later legislation with explicit overriding provisions must be given effect, and the object and purpose support this construction.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Judgment of the High Court upheld
- No order as to costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment