TEK CHAND versus SAT NARAYAN

TEK CHAND versus SAT NARAYAN

The exemption under the Act applies for ten years and continues till disposal/adjudication of the suit. The case is covered by the principle in Atma Ram Mittal v. Ishwar Singh Punia.

Parties
Petitioner: Tek Chand; Respondent: Sat Narayan
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
14 September 1989
Procedural Posture
Special Leave Petition (civil) / Dismissal
Outcome
Petition dismissed
Legal Topics
Exemption Period Under Haryana Urban (control of Rent & Eviction) Act, 1973, Execution of Decree Subject to Undertaking
Rent Control Eviction Exemption Period Under Haryana Urban (control of Rent & Eviction) Act, 1973 Execution of Decree Subject to Undertaking

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Tek Chand

Petitioner

Sat Narayan

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Special Leave Petition (civil) / Dismissal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Applicability and duration of exemption under Haryana Urban (Control of Rent & Eviction) Act, 1973
  2. 2 Execution of decree subject to filing of undertaking

Ratio Decidendi

The exemption under the Act applies for ten years and continues till disposal/adjudication of the suit. The case is covered by the principle in Atma Ram Mittal v. Ishwar Singh Punia.

Court Disposition

Petition dismissed

Orders

  • The special leave petition is dismissed.
  • Decree will not be executed till 30th April, 1990 subject to filing an undertaking on usual terms within four weeks.