SATLSH JAGGI versus STATE OF CHHATTLSHGARH AND ORS.
Though no bias or disinclination was indicated by the Sessions Judge, to ensure that justice is not only done but seen to be done, and in light of the peculiar facts, it is appropriate for the High Court to transfer the case to another Sessions Judge in Raipur. Such transfer does not cast aspersion on the present Sessions Judge.
- Parties
- Appellant: Satish Jaggi; Respondents: State of Chhattisgarh and Ors.
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 22 February 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Final Disposition
- Outcome
- Appeal disposed of
- Legal Topics
- Transfer of Case, Impartiality of Judge, Fair Trial, Administration of Justice
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Satish Jaggi
Appellant
State of Chhattisgarh and Ors.
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Final Disposition
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a criminal trial should be transferred to another Sessions Judge due to apprehension of bias and lack of impartiality.
Ratio Decidendi
Though no bias or disinclination was indicated by the Sessions Judge, to ensure that justice is not only done but seen to be done, and in light of the peculiar facts, it is appropriate for the High Court to transfer the case to another Sessions Judge in Raipur. Such transfer does not cast aspersion on the present Sessions Judge.
Court Disposition
Appeal disposed of
Orders
- High Court directed to transfer the case to another Sessions Court in Raipur
- The transfer shall not be construed as casting any aspersion on the Sessions Judge
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment