SATISH KUMAR & ORS. versus SURINDER KUMAR & ORS.
An arbitration award dividing immovable property exceeding Rs. 100 is compulsorily registerable under s. 17(1)(b) of the Indian Registration Act, 1908. An unregistered award cannot be admitted in evidence to affect immovable property, but is not a waste paper; it has legal effect, subject to registration requirements.
- Parties
- Appellant: Satish Kumar; Respondent: Surinder Kumar
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 27 September 1968
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal by Special Leave Against Punjab High Court Civil Revision Dismissal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed with costs.
- Legal Topics
- Registration of Awards, Partition of Immovable Property, Effect of Unregistered Arbitration Awards
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Satish Kumar
Appellant
Surinder Kumar
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal by Special Leave Against Punjab High Court Civil Revision Dismissal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether an award affecting partition of immovable property exceeding Rs. 100 requires compulsory registration under s. 17(1)(b) of the Indian Registration Act
- 2 Legal effect of unregistered arbitration awards
- 3 Whether rights created by an unregistered award can be enforced
Ratio Decidendi
An arbitration award dividing immovable property exceeding Rs. 100 is compulsorily registerable under s. 17(1)(b) of the Indian Registration Act, 1908. An unregistered award cannot be admitted in evidence to affect immovable property, but is not a waste paper; it has legal effect, subject to registration requirements.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed with costs.
Orders
- Award requires registration under s. 17(1)(b) of the Registration Act.
- Parties to pay their respective costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment