SATISH SITOLE versus SMT. GANGA
The Supreme Court held that as the marriage between the appellant and respondent is irretrievably broken, the continued existence of such marriage amounts to cruelty, warranting dissolution using the Court's powers under Article 142 of the Constitution, subject to payment of permanent alimony and costs.
- Parties
- Appellant: Satish Sitole; Respondent: Smt. Ganga
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 10 July 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal From High Court Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal disposed; marriage dissolved by Supreme Court under Article 142, subject to monetary conditions.
- Legal Topics
- Irretrievable Breakdown of Marriage, Divorce, Permanent Alimony, Cruelty, Judicial Separation, Exercise of Supreme Court Powers
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Satish Sitole
Appellant
Smt. Ganga
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal From High Court Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the irretrievable breakdown of marriage and prolonged separation constitutes cruelty and sufficient ground for dissolution of marriage under Article 142 of the Constitution of India
Ratio Decidendi
The Supreme Court held that as the marriage between the appellant and respondent is irretrievably broken, the continued existence of such marriage amounts to cruelty, warranting dissolution using the Court's powers under Article 142 of the Constitution, subject to payment of permanent alimony and costs.
Court Disposition
Appeal disposed; marriage dissolved by Supreme Court under Article 142, subject to monetary conditions.
Orders
- Marriage between appellant and respondent stands dissolved.
- Appellant to pay respondent Rs.2,00,000 by way of permanent alimony.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment