SATYA DEV BUSHAHRI* versus PADAM DEV AND OTHERS.
Section 7(d) of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 was not extended to elections in Part C States by Government of Part C States Act, 1951, and only contracts with the Central Government could cause disqualification for Parliament; contracts with the State Government do not disqualify a candidate for the State Assembly under section 17. Proposing or seconding by government servants and appointment as polling agent do not constitute an infringement of s.123(8).
- Parties
- Appellant: Satya Dev Bushahri; Respondent: Padam Dev; Respondent: Gyan Singh; Proposer: Daulataram; Seconder: Motiram; Polling Agent: Sital Singh
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 25 May 1954
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal by Special Leave From Election Tribunal Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Disqualification of Candidates, Government Contracts and Elections, Appointment of Government Servants as Polling Agents, Proposing or Seconding Nomination Papers by Government Servants
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Satya Dev Bushahri
Appellant
Padam Dev
Respondent
Gyan Singh
Respondent
Daulataram
Proposer
Motiram
Seconder
Sital Singh
Polling Agent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal by Special Leave From Election Tribunal Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether s.7(d) of Representation of the People Act, 1951, applies to elections in Part C States and disqualifies a candidate for contracts with the State Government
- 2 Whether proposing or seconding nomination papers by government servants is prohibited by s.123(8) of Representation of the People Act, 1951
- 3 Whether the appointment of a government servant as a polling agent infringes s.123(8) of the Representation of the People Act, 1951
Ratio Decidendi
Section 7(d) of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 was not extended to elections in Part C States by Government of Part C States Act, 1951, and only contracts with the Central Government could cause disqualification for Parliament; contracts with the State Government do not disqualify a candidate for the State Assembly under section 17. Proposing or seconding by government servants and appointment as polling agent do not constitute an infringement of s.123(8).
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Election Tribunal's findings upheld
- Padam Dev not disqualified under section 7(d) or section 123(8)
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment