SATYA PRAKASH & ORS. versus STATE OF BIHAR & ORS.
Appellants are not entitled to regularization because they were never appointed to any sanctioned posts, only engaged on daily wages. Para 53 of Uma Devi's judgment applies only to irregular appointments in sanctioned posts, not to daily wage or ad hoc employees. The directions sought cannot be granted following the constitutional scheme of public employment.
- Parties
- Appellant: Satya Prakash & Ors.; Respondent: State of Bihar & Ors.
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 16 March 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Final Disposal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Regularization of Daily Wage Workers, Public Employment, Irregular Appointments, Selection Process
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Satya Prakash & Ors.
Appellant
State of Bihar & Ors.
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Final Disposal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether daily wage workers who have worked for more than 10 years are entitled to regularization on the strength of Uma Devi's judgment
- 2 Whether the benefit of regularization extends to those not appointed in sanctioned posts
Ratio Decidendi
Appellants are not entitled to regularization because they were never appointed to any sanctioned posts, only engaged on daily wages. Para 53 of Uma Devi's judgment applies only to irregular appointments in sanctioned posts, not to daily wage or ad hoc employees. The directions sought cannot be granted following the constitutional scheme of public employment.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- If Board undertakes regular selection process in future, appellants' applications may be considered with age relaxation and weightage for previous engagement.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment