SCIENTIFIC ADVISOR TO RAKSHA MANTRI versus V.M. JOSEPH
Eligibility for promotion depends on the total qualifying service, including service rendered as a permanent employee prior to transfer, and cannot be limited by the fact that an employee was placed at the bottom of a new seniority list upon transfer at his own request; exclusion of such period is unjustified.
- Parties
- Appellant: Scientific Advisor to Raksha Mantri; Respondent: V.M. Joseph
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 14 January 1989
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Appellate Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Promotion Eligibility, Seniority, Transfer on Compassionate Ground
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Scientific Advisor to Raksha Mantri
Appellant
V.M. Joseph
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Appellate Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether period of service rendered as permanent employee prior to transfer on compassionate grounds can be excluded in determining eligibility for promotion
- 2 Whether eligibility for promotion and seniority are distinct
Ratio Decidendi
Eligibility for promotion depends on the total qualifying service, including service rendered as a permanent employee prior to transfer, and cannot be limited by the fact that an employee was placed at the bottom of a new seniority list upon transfer at his own request; exclusion of such period is unjustified.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Direction to consider respondent's service prior to transfer as qualifying service for promotion eligibility
- Review Departmental Promotion Committee to consider respondent for ad-hoc or regular promotion to Senior Store Keeper and Senior Store Keeper Grade-I with effect from date when three years of regular service is completed, including prior service
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment