SEVA LAL versus SRI KANT & ORS.
There was no provision in Section 219 prior to the 1997 amendment barring the revision filed by the appellant. The amended provision of 1997 does not apply to pending revision applications already preferred under the then existing Section 219. The revision before the Board of Revenue in 1994 is maintainable under unamended Section 219.
- Parties
- Appellant: Seva Lal; Respondents: Sri Kant & Ors.
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 03 September 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal From High Court Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Revision Proceedings Under Uttar Pradesh Land Revenue Act, Mutation of Land Records
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Seva Lal
Appellant
Sri Kant & Ors.
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal From High Court Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a revision under Section 219 of the Uttar Pradesh Land Revenue Act, 1901 was maintainable in 1994 before the Board of Revenue, in light of the subsequent amendment in 1997
Ratio Decidendi
There was no provision in Section 219 prior to the 1997 amendment barring the revision filed by the appellant. The amended provision of 1997 does not apply to pending revision applications already preferred under the then existing Section 219. The revision before the Board of Revenue in 1994 is maintainable under unamended Section 219.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Order of the High Court is set aside
- Writ Petition No. 59678 of 2009 is restored to the file of Allahabad High Court for hearing and consideration on merits
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment