THE SECRETARY (ESTT.) RAILWAY BOARD AND ANR. ETC. versus SH. D. FRANCIS PAUL ETC.
The amendment to Rule 2423-A dated 15.11.1976 is prospective and applies only to candidates appointed after the amendment; those appointed earlier are not governed by amended proviso.
- Parties
- Petitioner: The Secretary (Estt.) Railway Board and Anr.; Respondent: Sh. D. Francis Paul; Etc.
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 15 July 1996
- Procedural Posture
- Special Leave Petition (civil) / Final Order
- Outcome
- Petitions dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Railways, Pension Computation, Rule 2423 a Applicability, Retrospectivity of Rule Amendments
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Parties
The Secretary (Estt.) Railway Board and Anr.
Petitioner
Sh. D. Francis Paul
Respondent
Etc.
Procedural Posture
Special Leave Petition (civil) / Final Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether amendment of Rule 2423-A dated 15.11.1976 has retrospective effect for persons appointed prior to the amendment
- 2 Whether respondents are entitled to benefit of addition of five years in qualifying service for pension in absence of specific provision in recruitment rules
Ratio Decidendi
The amendment to Rule 2423-A dated 15.11.1976 is prospective and applies only to candidates appointed after the amendment; those appointed earlier are not governed by amended proviso.
Court Disposition
Petitions dismissed
Orders
- Special leave petitions dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment