S.H. RANGAPPA versus STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ANR.

S.H. RANGAPPA versus STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ANR.

The requirement under Section 6(1) is only that the declaration be made within one year after publication of the Section 4 notification; there is no statutory time limit for its publication under Section 6(2); appeals dismissed as the declaration was made within time.

Parties
Appellant: S.H. Rangappa; Respondent: State of Karnataka; Respondent: Karnataka Housing Board
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
03 October 2001
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Final Judgment, Supreme Court of India
Outcome
appeals dismissed
Legal Topics
Declaration Under Land Acquisition Act, Limitation Period for Publication, Interpretation of Section 6(1), 6(2) Land Acquisition Act 1894

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

S.H. Rangappa

Appellant

State of Karnataka

Respondent

Karnataka Housing Board

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Final Judgment, Supreme Court of India

  1. 1 Whether the notification under Section 6(2) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 should be published within the period prescribed by the proviso to Section 6(1)?

Ratio Decidendi

The requirement under Section 6(1) is only that the declaration be made within one year after publication of the Section 4 notification; there is no statutory time limit for its publication under Section 6(2); appeals dismissed as the declaration was made within time.

Court Disposition

appeals dismissed

Orders

  • Appeals dismissed with no order as to costs