SHAKUNTLA DEVI versus STATE OF H.P. AND OTHERS
The appellant had not accepted the Supplementary Negotiated Award, as evidenced by filing the writ petition before receiving compensation and within six months from the award. Therefore, she must be given an opportunity to make a request for reference under Section 18 for enhancement of compensation and original benefits in respect of the Supplementary Award.
- Parties
- Appellant: Shakuntla Devi; Respondents: State of Himachal Pradesh and Others
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 02 March 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal Decided
- Outcome
- Appeal disposed of
- Legal Topics
- Negotiated Award, Enhancement of Compensation, Statutory Benefits, Reference Under Section 18, Article 226 Writ Petition
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Shakuntla Devi
Appellant
State of Himachal Pradesh and Others
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal Decided
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant had accepted the Negotiated Supplementary Award for structures and trees
- 2 Entitlement to seek statutory benefits and reference under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894
Ratio Decidendi
The appellant had not accepted the Supplementary Negotiated Award, as evidenced by filing the writ petition before receiving compensation and within six months from the award. Therefore, she must be given an opportunity to make a request for reference under Section 18 for enhancement of compensation and original benefits in respect of the Supplementary Award.
Court Disposition
Appeal disposed of
Orders
- Appellant is given an opportunity to make a request for reference under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act before the Land Acquisition Collector for enhancement of compensation and all other original benefits in respect of the Supplementary Negotiated Award.
- If such an application for reference is made within four weeks, it shall be referred to the Court of competent jurisdiction within a month, and the Reference Court shall dispose of the reference expeditiously, preferably within six months.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment