SHALU OJHA versus PRASHANT OJHA
Final determination of maintenance should be based on evidence led by both parties in the Family Court; pending High Court proceedings regarding interim maintenance should be expedited, and the Supreme Court refrains from entertaining the SLP when proceedings are pending unless attempts at amicable resolution fail.
- Parties
- Appellant: Shalu Ojha; Respondent: Prashant Ojha
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 04 September 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Special Leave Petition (criminal) / Final Disposal by Supreme Court
- Outcome
- SLP disposed of
- Legal Topics
- Maintenance, Domestic Violence, Interim Orders, Appeals
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Shalu Ojha
Appellant
Prashant Ojha
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Special Leave Petition (criminal) / Final Disposal by Supreme Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the learned Additional Sessions Judge rightly reduced the maintenance amount from Rs.2,50,000/- to Rs.50,000/- per month
- 2 Whether the appellant is entitled to enhancement of maintenance
- 3 Whether the High Court or Sessions Court has power to grant interim stay of execution of maintenance orders
Ratio Decidendi
Final determination of maintenance should be based on evidence led by both parties in the Family Court; pending High Court proceedings regarding interim maintenance should be expedited, and the Supreme Court refrains from entertaining the SLP when proceedings are pending unless attempts at amicable resolution fail.
Court Disposition
SLP disposed of
Orders
- Family Court to decide domestic violence proceedings within eight months, fixing maintenance rate finally based on evidence.
- Both parties to file necessary documents within four weeks and lead evidence.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment