SHAMBU NATH MEHRA versus THE STATE OF AJMER.

SHAMBU NATH MEHRA versus THE STATE OF AJMER.

Section 106 of the Evidence Act is not applicable where the prosecution can equally access proof of facts with diligence; the burden of proof remains with the prosecution. The evidence adduced did not warrant conviction, and no valid conviction could rest on the material produced.

Parties
Appellant: Shambu Nath Mehra; Respondent: The State of Ajmer
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
12 March 1956
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal by Special Leave From Judgment and Order of the Judicial Commissioner's Court at Ajmer
Outcome
Acquittal restored; conviction set aside
Legal Topics
Burden of Proof, Facts Within Especial Knowledge, Section 106 Evidence Act, Section 420 Indian Penal Code, Section 5(2) Prevention of Corruption Act

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Shambu Nath Mehra

Appellant

The State of Ajmer

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal by Special Leave From Judgment and Order of the Judicial Commissioner's Court at Ajmer

  1. 1 Whether the burden of proving payment of second class railway fare was on the accused under section 106 of the Evidence Act
  2. 2 Applicability of Illustration (b) to section 106 Evidence Act in the present case

Ratio Decidendi

Section 106 of the Evidence Act is not applicable where the prosecution can equally access proof of facts with diligence; the burden of proof remains with the prosecution. The evidence adduced did not warrant conviction, and no valid conviction could rest on the material produced.

Court Disposition

Acquittal restored; conviction set aside

Orders

  • Order of Judicial Commissioner set aside
  • Order of Sessions Judge acquitting the appellant restored