SHAMSU SUHARA BEEVI versus G. ALEX AND ANR.

SHAMSU SUHARA BEEVI versus G. ALEX AND ANR.

The Supreme Court held that no compensation can be awarded under Section 21 of the Specific Relief Act unless there is a specific claim for compensation in the plaint or by amendment. The High Court erred in granting compensation (including costs, survey expenses, and interest) where such claim was not made. Only costs decreed in the main suit may be recovered separately, not as compensation under Section 21.

Parties
Appellant: Shamsu Suhara Beevi; Respondent: G. Alex
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
20 August 2004
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal From Kerala High Court Judgment in CRP No. 2267 of 1999
Outcome
Appeal allowed; judgments of Trial Court and High Court set aside.
Legal Topics
Specific Performance, Compensation for Breach of Contract, Amendment of Pleadings

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 9
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Shamsu Suhara Beevi

Appellant

G. Alex

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal From Kerala High Court Judgment in CRP No. 2267 of 1999

  1. 1 Whether compensation can be awarded under Section 21 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 when not claimed in the plaint or by amendment.
  2. 2 Can costs awarded in the main suit be included as compensation under Section 21 of the Act?

Ratio Decidendi

The Supreme Court held that no compensation can be awarded under Section 21 of the Specific Relief Act unless there is a specific claim for compensation in the plaint or by amendment. The High Court erred in granting compensation (including costs, survey expenses, and interest) where such claim was not made. Only costs decreed in the main suit may be recovered separately, not as compensation under Section 21.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed; judgments of Trial Court and High Court set aside.

Orders

  • Applications filed by respondents under Section 28(3) dismissed.
  • Appellants entitled to withdraw amount deposited in Court/Bank except excess amount deposited by plaintiff/respondents, along with accrued interest, if not already withdrawn.