SHANKAR MADHOJI NEMADE versus CHISUJI JANAJI BHADKE & ORS.
Section 52 of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands (Vidarbha Region and Kutch Area) Act, 1958 applies to cases where the landlord took possession under section 9 of the Berar Act but had not completed the statutory two-year period of personal cultivation by the time the Bombay Act came into force; the obligation is enlarged to twelve years and the tenant retains the right to restoration if the landlord ceases to cultivate or transfers the land within twelve years. The earlier contrary Full Bench decision is not correct in its reasoning.
- Parties
- Appellant: Shankar Madhoji Nemade; Respondent: Chisuji Janaji Bhadke; Respondent: Other respondents (not named)
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 08 September 1970
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Supreme Court on Appeal by Special Leave From Bombay High Court (nagpur Bench) Judgment Dated August 19, 1966, in Special Civil Application No. 831 of 1965
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Tenancy Termination, Protected Lessee Rights, Restoration of Possession, Statutory Interpretation, Savings and Repeal Provisions
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Shankar Madhoji Nemade
Appellant
Chisuji Janaji Bhadke
Respondent
Other respondents (not named)
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Supreme Court on Appeal by Special Leave From Bombay High Court (nagpur Bench) Judgment Dated August 19, 1966, in Special Civil Application No. 831 of 1965
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether section 52 of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands (Vidarbha Region and Kutch Area) Act, 1958 applies to the present facts
- 2 Whether the special leave granted should be cancelled on the ground of an allegedly false statement regarding valuation
Ratio Decidendi
Section 52 of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands (Vidarbha Region and Kutch Area) Act, 1958 applies to cases where the landlord took possession under section 9 of the Berar Act but had not completed the statutory two-year period of personal cultivation by the time the Bombay Act came into force; the obligation is enlarged to twelve years and the tenant retains the right to restoration if the landlord ceases to cultivate or transfers the land within twelve years. The earlier contrary Full Bench decision is not correct in its reasoning.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Judgment and order of the High Court set aside.
- Orders of the Special Deputy Collector and the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal restored.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment