SHASHIKANT versus CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION AND ORS.

SHASHIKANT versus CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION AND ORS.

Where only an anonymous complaint is received, it is within CBI's discretion to conduct a preliminary inquiry in accordance with the CBI Manual; full-fledged investigation/FIR is not obligatory unless sufficient material for cognizable offence emerges. Courts ordinarily should not direct the manner of investigation except in exceptional cases.

Parties
Appellant: Shashikant; Respondents: Central Bureau of Investigation and Ors.
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
07 November 2006
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal From Judgment and Final Order of the High Court (criminal Writ Petition No. 558 of 2005, Nagpur Bench)
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Corruption, Investigation Procedures, Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, CBI Manual, Preliminary Inquiry, Anonymous Complaints

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 10 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Shashikant

Appellant

Central Bureau of Investigation and Ors.

Respondents

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal From Judgment and Final Order of the High Court (criminal Writ Petition No. 558 of 2005, Nagpur Bench)

  1. 1 Is it obligatory for CBI to lodge an FIR and conduct full-fledged investigation based on every anonymous complaint?
  2. 2 Was the preliminary enquiry conducted by CBI sufficient under applicable legal procedures?
  3. 3 Should courts direct investigative agencies in their manner of investigation?

Ratio Decidendi

Where only an anonymous complaint is received, it is within CBI's discretion to conduct a preliminary inquiry in accordance with the CBI Manual; full-fledged investigation/FIR is not obligatory unless sufficient material for cognizable offence emerges. Courts ordinarily should not direct the manner of investigation except in exceptional cases.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Order of the High Court in Criminal Writ Petition No. 558 of 2005 affirmed
  • Appellant's obligation to pay costs of Rs.5,000/- set aside