SHEILA B. DAS versus P.R. SUGASREE

SHEILA B. DAS versus P.R. SUGASREE

The best interest and welfare of the minor child are paramount. The child, having reached the age of 12 and being highly intelligent, made a clear and informed preference to stay with her father, with whom she felt more comfortable, and had established supportive relationships in her father's household. The respondent had not neglected the child, who was happy and doing well academically. There was no valid disqualification of the father as guardian. Therefore, the child's welfare would be best served by granting custody to the father, with sufficient access and visitation rights to the mother.

Parties
Appellant: Sheila B. Das; Respondent: P.R. Sugasree
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
17 February 2006
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Final Disposition
Outcome
appeal disposed of
Legal Topics
Custody of Child, Guardianship, Visitation Rights, Divorce, Welfare of Minor
Family Law Custody of Child Guardianship Visitation Rights Divorce Welfare of Minor

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 8 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Sheila B. Das

Appellant

P.R. Sugasree

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Final Disposition

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Who should be granted custody of the minor child after divorce between parents?
  2. 2 What arrangement best serves the welfare and interests of the minor child?
  3. 3 Extent of visitation rights for the non-custodial parent

Ratio Decidendi

The best interest and welfare of the minor child are paramount. The child, having reached the age of 12 and being highly intelligent, made a clear and informed preference to stay with her father, with whom she felt more comfortable, and had established supportive relationships in her father's household. The respondent had not neglected the child, who was happy and doing well academically. There was no valid disqualification of the father as guardian. Therefore, the child's welfare would be best served by granting custody to the father, with sufficient access and visitation rights to the mother.

Court Disposition

appeal disposed of

Orders

  • Custody of the minor child to remain with the respondent-father.
  • Respondent-father to arrange for the child to continue her schooling and extracurricular activities.