VISHNU AWATAR ETC. versus SHIV AUTAR AND ORS.
Section 3 of the Code of Civil Procedure (U.P.) Amendment Act, 1978 precludes revision to the High Court under Section 115 CPC from a District Court's appellate order if the suit value is less than Rs. 20,000/-, except when the District Court makes an original decision; the Allahabad High Court's interpretation was correct.
- Parties
- Petitioner: Vishnu Awatar etc.; Respondent: Shiv Autar and Ors.
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 02 May 1980
- Procedural Posture
- Special Leave Petition (civil) / Dismissed
- Outcome
- Petitions dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Revisional Jurisdiction, High Court Powers, District Court Powers, U.p. Code of Civil Procedure Amendment, Access to Justice, Judicial Hierarchy
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Vishnu Awatar etc.
Petitioner
Shiv Autar and Ors.
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Special Leave Petition (civil) / Dismissed
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Section 3 of the Code of Civil Procedure (U.P.) Amendment Act, 1978 precludes revision to the High Court under Section 115 of CPC from judgments/orders by the District Court in appeals where the suit value is less than Rs. 20,000/-
Ratio Decidendi
Section 3 of the Code of Civil Procedure (U.P.) Amendment Act, 1978 precludes revision to the High Court under Section 115 CPC from a District Court's appellate order if the suit value is less than Rs. 20,000/-, except when the District Court makes an original decision; the Allahabad High Court's interpretation was correct.
Court Disposition
Petitions dismissed
Orders
- Special Leave Petition Nos. 9945, 10550, and 8857 of 1979 dismissed; District Court's appellate order is final for cases below Rs. 20,000/- as per Section 3 of the U.P. Amendment Act.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment