SHIV KUMAR SHARMA versus HARYANA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, CHANDIGARH & ORS.
The Board acted illegally and arbitrarily by confirming the appellant later than his juniors and placing him below them in seniority based on a penalty which had no effect on seniority; seniority should be based on the date of appointment, not on minor penalties or arbitrary confirmation dates.
- Parties
- Appellant: Shiv Kumar Sharma; Respondents: Haryana State Electricity Board, Chandigarh & Ors.
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 27 July 1988
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal No. 301 of 1984 / Appeal by Special Leave Against High Court Letters Patent Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Seniority, Confirmation, Arbitrariness in Executive Action, Minor Penalty Impact
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Shiv Kumar Sharma
Appellant
Haryana State Electricity Board, Chandigarh & Ors.
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal No. 301 of 1984 / Appeal by Special Leave Against High Court Letters Patent Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant was rightly placed below his juniors in the seniority list due to a minor penalty and confirmation date
- 2 Whether the Board acted arbitrarily in confirming the appellant later and affecting his seniority
Ratio Decidendi
The Board acted illegally and arbitrarily by confirming the appellant later than his juniors and placing him below them in seniority based on a penalty which had no effect on seniority; seniority should be based on the date of appointment, not on minor penalties or arbitrary confirmation dates.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Judgment of learned Single Judge and Division Bench of High Court set aside
- Impugned seniority list set aside
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment