MRS. P.K. SANDHU versus SHIV RAJ V. PATIL ETC.

MRS. P.K. SANDHU versus SHIV RAJ V. PATIL ETC.

The amendments to the Lok Sabha Secretariat recruitment rules prescribing 75% posts for promotion and 25% for deputation, as well as eligibility conditions including length of service, are fair, reasonable, not arbitrary, and do not violate Article 14. Deputation and contract appointments are valid under the amended rules, and the Speaker has authority for such appointments.

Parties
Petitioner: Mrs. P.K. Sandhu; Respondent: Shiv Raj V. Patil; Petitioner: Manoj K. Das; Petitioner: Srilok N. Rath; Respondent: Neeraj Kishan Kaul; Respondent: Manoj Wad; Respondent: Ashish Wad; Respondent: Abraham N.A.; Respondent: Mrs. J.S. Wad; Respondent: Mrs. Anil Katiyar; Respondent: Mrs. Kiran Suri
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
25 March 1997
Procedural Posture
Writ Petition (civil) / Final Order
Outcome
Petitions dismissed
Legal Topics
Recruitment Rules, Promotion, Deputation, Quo Warranto, Arbitrariness Under Article 14

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 13
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mrs. P.K. Sandhu

Petitioner

Shiv Raj V. Patil

Respondent

Manoj K. Das

Petitioner

Srilok N. Rath

Petitioner

Neeraj Kishan Kaul

Respondent

Manoj Wad

Respondent

Ashish Wad

Respondent

Abraham N.A.

Respondent

Mrs. J.S. Wad

Respondent

Mrs. Anil Katiyar

Respondent

Mrs. Kiran Suri

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Writ Petition (civil) / Final Order

  1. 1 Validity of amended Lok Sabha Secretariat recruitment rules for appointment and promotion to senior posts
  2. 2 Legal authority of Speaker for deputation and contract appointments
  3. 3 Whether prescription of years of service for promotion is arbitrary and violates Article 14

Ratio Decidendi

The amendments to the Lok Sabha Secretariat recruitment rules prescribing 75% posts for promotion and 25% for deputation, as well as eligibility conditions including length of service, are fair, reasonable, not arbitrary, and do not violate Article 14. Deputation and contract appointments are valid under the amended rules, and the Speaker has authority for such appointments.

Court Disposition

Petitions dismissed

Orders

  • Petitions dismissed. No costs.