SHODA DEVI versus DDU/RIPON HOSPITAL SHIMLA AND ORS.

SHODA DEVI versus DDU/RIPON HOSPITAL SHIMLA AND ORS.

The Supreme Court held the appellant was entitled to enhanced compensation for loss and disablement due to medical negligence, especially considering her poor and rural background, age, and the trauma suffered. The compensation awarded by the lower forums was found restrictive and was enhanced to provide reasonable relief to the appellant and her family.

Parties
Appellant: Shoda Devi; Respondents: DDU/Ripon Hospital Shimla and Ors.
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
07 March 2019
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal Before Supreme Court Seeking Enhancement of Compensation
Outcome
Appeal allowed
Legal Topics
Compensation, Medical Negligence, Assessment of Damages

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Shoda Devi

Appellant

DDU/Ripon Hospital Shimla and Ors.

Respondents

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal Before Supreme Court Seeking Enhancement of Compensation

  1. 1 Whether the appellant is entitled to enhanced compensation for disablement due to medical negligence resulting in amputation of the right arm
  2. 2 What factors should be considered in determining compensation in medical negligence cases involving poor and rural victims

Ratio Decidendi

The Supreme Court held the appellant was entitled to enhanced compensation for loss and disablement due to medical negligence, especially considering her poor and rural background, age, and the trauma suffered. The compensation awarded by the lower forums was found restrictive and was enhanced to provide reasonable relief to the appellant and her family.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed

Orders

  • Appellant awarded Rs. 10,00,000 as compensation over and above amounts previously awarded by State and National Commission
  • Respondents shall pay the amount within 3 months, failing which enhanced compensation shall carry interest at 6% per annum from the date of filing of the complaint before the State Commission