SHRI BALASAHEB K. THACKERAY AND ANR. versus SHRL VENKAT @ BABRU AND ANR.
Heirs of the complainant can continue prosecution after obtaining permission from the Court as per Section 302 Cr.P.C.
- Parties
- Appellant: SHRI BALASAHEB K. THACKERAY; Appellant: ANR.; Respondent: SHRI VENKAT @ BABRU; Respondent: ANR.; Respondent: S.S. Shinde; Respondent: Ravindra Keshavrao Adsure
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 05 July 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Pending
- Outcome
- Appeal pending; application to be filed by legal heirs, to be dealt with by court
- Legal Topics
- Private Complaint, Death of Complainant, Prosecution by Legal Heirs
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2
Parties
SHRI BALASAHEB K. THACKERAY
Appellant
ANR.
Appellant
SHRI VENKAT @ BABRU
Respondent
ANR.
Respondent
S.S. Shinde
Respondent
Ravindra Keshavrao Adsure
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Pending
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether legal heirs of a deceased complainant can continue prosecution in a private complaint under Section 302 Cr.P.C.
- 2 Effect of death of complainant during pendency of criminal proceedings
Ratio Decidendi
Heirs of the complainant can continue prosecution after obtaining permission from the Court as per Section 302 Cr.P.C.
Court Disposition
Appeal pending; application to be filed by legal heirs, to be dealt with by court
Orders
- Legal heirs permitted to file application for permission to prosecute; if filed, to be dealt with appropriately.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment