SHRI BIRDHICHAND SHARMA versus FIRST CIVIL JUDGE NAGPUR AND OTHERS
Respondents 2 to 4, working in the factory under managerial supervision, subject to attendance, factory hours, management control by rejection of substandard work, and removal for absenteeism, are workers under s. 2(1) of the Factories Act. Piece-rate payment does not exclude them from this status. They are entitled to leave under s. 79 of the Act upon meeting minimum days worked.
- Parties
- Appellant: Shri Birdhichand Sharma; Respondents: First Civil Judge Nagpur and Others; Respondents: Respondents Nos. 2-4; Intervener: Intervener (State of Bombay)
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 09 December 1960
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal by Special Leave
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Definition of Workman, Leave Under Factories Act, Piece Rate Employment, Supervision and Control in Employment
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Shri Birdhichand Sharma
Appellant
First Civil Judge Nagpur and Others
Respondents
Respondents Nos. 2-4
Respondents
Intervener (State of Bombay)
Intervener
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal by Special Leave
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether respondents were workers within the meaning of s. 2(1) of the Factories Act, 1948
- 2 Whether leave under s. 79 of the Factories Act applies to piece-rate workers
Ratio Decidendi
Respondents 2 to 4, working in the factory under managerial supervision, subject to attendance, factory hours, management control by rejection of substandard work, and removal for absenteeism, are workers under s. 2(1) of the Factories Act. Piece-rate payment does not exclude them from this status. They are entitled to leave under s. 79 of the Act upon meeting minimum days worked.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Respondents entitled to proportionate leave under s. 79 Factories Act if minimum days worked are met.
- Appeal dismissed with costs; one set of hearing costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment