SHRI CHAMBA SINGH versus STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS.
Forfeiture of service for the purpose of increment under Punjab Police Rules, 1934, does not affect the calculation of qualifying service for pension nor serves as a break in service for the purpose of compulsory retirement. The employee's right to receive increments alone is affected, not the period of qualifying service.
- Parties
- Appellant: Shri Chamba Singh; Respondents: State of Punjab and Ors.
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 09 April 1997
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal Nos. 1799 1800 of 1990 / Appeal From Punjab & Haryana High Court Judgment Dated 31.3.89
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Premature Retirement, Qualifying Service for Pension, Forfeiture of Service for Increment
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Shri Chamba Singh
Appellant
State of Punjab and Ors.
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal Nos. 1799 1800 of 1990 / Appeal From Punjab & Haryana High Court Judgment Dated 31.3.89
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether forfeiture of service for increment affects qualifying service for pension under the Punjab Civil Services (Premature Retirement) Rules, 1975.
- 2 Whether the appellant had completed 25 years of qualifying service for the purpose of compulsory retirement.
Ratio Decidendi
Forfeiture of service for the purpose of increment under Punjab Police Rules, 1934, does not affect the calculation of qualifying service for pension nor serves as a break in service for the purpose of compulsory retirement. The employee's right to receive increments alone is affected, not the period of qualifying service.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed.
- No order as to costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment