SHRI DEVENDRA MANAGEMENT TRAINEES AND ORS. versus PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK

SHRI DEVENDRA MANAGEMENT TRAINEES AND ORS. versus PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK

The respondent-bank did not act arbitrarily or discriminatorily in evolving the fitment formula under Circular No. 492 dated 16.1.1980. On the appointed date, appellants were not in the regular time scale, and thus not entitled to benefits of the revised scale. Bringing all to the revised pay structure was...

Source-derived case information.

Parties
Appellant: Shri Devendra Management Trainees and Ors.; Respondent: Punjab National Bank; Impleading Party: Mukul Mudgal
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
26 November 1993
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Summary Rejection of Writ Petition by Delhi High Court
Outcome
Appeal dismissed.
Legal Topics
Pay Structure Revision, Reservation, Discrimination, Fitment Formula, Dearness Allowance
Service Law Constitutional Law Banking Law Pay Structure Revision Reservation Discrimination Fitment Formula Dearness Allowance

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Shri Devendra Management Trainees and Ors.

Appellant

Punjab National Bank

Respondent

Mukul Mudgal

Impleading Party

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal From Summary Rejection of Writ Petition by Delhi High Court

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the respondent Bank acted arbitrarily or discriminatorily in evolving the fitment formula for Management Trainees under Circular No. 492 dated 16.1.1980 and thereby violated Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution
  2. 2 Whether appellants were entitled to the benefit of the fitment formula applicable to managerial cadre and to fixation at a higher basic salary

Ratio Decidendi

The respondent-bank did not act arbitrarily or discriminatorily in evolving the fitment formula under Circular No. 492 dated 16.1.1980. On the appointed date, appellants were not in the regular time scale, and thus not entitled to benefits of the revised scale. Bringing all to the revised pay structure was reasonable and necessary to prevent anomalies, and the requirements for confirmation were appropriately waived to ensure uniformity. No violation of Articles 14/16 occurred.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed.

Orders

  • Respondent-bank will not recover any excess payment which was stayed by this Court's order dated 7th December 1982.