SHRI GURUDATTA SUGARS MARKETING PVT. LTD. versus PRITHVIRAJ SAYAJIRAO DESHMUKH & ORS.
The term 'drawer' in Section 143-A refers to the issuer of the cheque (the legal drawer, here the company); an authorised signatory does not become the drawer for purposes of Section 143-A and therefore cannot be directed to pay interim compensation under that provision; vicarious liability of officers arises only under Section 141 when its conditions are satisfied, and cannot be read into Section 143-A.
- Parties
- Appellant: Shri Gurudatta Sugars Marketing Pvt. Ltd.; Respondents: Prithviraj Sayajirao Deshmukh & Ors.
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 24 July 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal Nos. 3070 3071 of 2024 / Appeal Against High Court Judgment and Order Dated 08.03.2023 and 29.03.2023
- Outcome
- Appeals dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Section 138 NI Act, Section 141 NI Act, Section 143 a NI Act, Drawer (definition), Authorized Signatory of Company, Interim Compensation, Vicarious Liability in Criminal Law, Statutory Interpretation, Cirp/moratorium Under IBC
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Shri Gurudatta Sugars Marketing Pvt. Ltd.
Appellant
Prithviraj Sayajirao Deshmukh & Ors.
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal Nos. 3070 3071 of 2024 / Appeal Against High Court Judgment and Order Dated 08.03.2023 and 29.03.2023
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the signatory of the cheque, authorized by the company, is the 'drawer' and whether such signatory can be directed to pay interim compensation under Section 143-A, NI Act leaving aside the company
- 2 Whether liability for interim compensation under Section 143-A can be imposed on directors/authorized signatories when the company (drawer) is under CIRP/moratorium
- 3 Extent to which Section 141 creates vicarious/criminal liability for officers of a company in cheque dishonour matters
Ratio Decidendi
The term 'drawer' in Section 143-A refers to the issuer of the cheque (the legal drawer, here the company); an authorised signatory does not become the drawer for purposes of Section 143-A and therefore cannot be directed to pay interim compensation under that provision; vicarious liability of officers arises only under Section 141 when its conditions are satisfied, and cannot be read into Section 143-A.
Court Disposition
Appeals dismissed
Orders
- Appeals dismissed
- High Court judgments and orders dated 08.03.2023 and 29.03.2023 upheld
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment