SHRI KISHUN & ORS. versus STATE OF U.P.
Since it could not be established which accused gave the fatal blow and common intention was found only to cause grievous hurt, all four accused are guilty only under section 325 read with section 34 IPC, not murder under section 302/34 IPC.
- Parties
- Appellant: Shri Kishun; Appellant: Ram Bali; Appellant: Jai Shri; Appellant: Jattan; Respondent: State of U.P.
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 28 July 1972
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal by Special Leave From Judgment of the Allahabad High Court
- Outcome
- Conviction altered; each appellant convicted under section 325 read with section 34 IPC instead of section 302/34 IPC; sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for five years; sentence under section 323/34 IPC (one year) to run concurrently.
- Legal Topics
- Common Intention, Murder, Culpable Homicide, Grievous Hurt
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Shri Kishun
Appellant
Ram Bali
Appellant
Jai Shri
Appellant
Jattan
Appellant
State of U.P.
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal by Special Leave From Judgment of the Allahabad High Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the accused can be held guilty of murder under section 302 read with section 34 IPC, or only a lesser offence under section 325/34 IPC
Ratio Decidendi
Since it could not be established which accused gave the fatal blow and common intention was found only to cause grievous hurt, all four accused are guilty only under section 325 read with section 34 IPC, not murder under section 302/34 IPC.
Court Disposition
Conviction altered; each appellant convicted under section 325 read with section 34 IPC instead of section 302/34 IPC; sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for five years; sentence under section 323/34 IPC (one year) to run concurrently.
Orders
- Conviction altered from section 302/34 IPC to section 325/34 IPC for all accused.
- Each accused sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for five years under section 325/34 IPC.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment