SHRI V.J. THOMAS versus SHRI PATHROSE ABRAHAM & ORS.

SHRI V.J. THOMAS versus SHRI PATHROSE ABRAHAM & ORS.

Applications for impleadment were rightly allowed by the executing court to enable the applicants to seek setting aside of the ex parte decree, and there is no reason for the Supreme Court to interfere in discretionary jurisdiction under Article 136 as a decree obtained by suppression or collusion cannot be executed against non-parties.

Parties
Appellant: SHRI V.J. THOMAS; Respondents: SHRI PATHROSE ABRAHAM & ORS.
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
05 February 2008
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Revision Order; Judgment on Merits
Outcome
Appeal dismissed with costs.
Legal Topics
Impleadment of Parties, Execution of Decree, Representative Suits, Discretion Under Article 136

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

SHRI V.J. THOMAS

Appellant

SHRI PATHROSE ABRAHAM & ORS.

Respondents

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Revision Order; Judgment on Merits

  1. 1 Whether third parties can be impleaded in a suit filed under Order I Rule 8 of the Code of Civil Procedure after a decree has been passed
  2. 2 Whether a decree obtained by suppression of fact or collusion is executable against non-parties

Ratio Decidendi

Applications for impleadment were rightly allowed by the executing court to enable the applicants to seek setting aside of the ex parte decree, and there is no reason for the Supreme Court to interfere in discretionary jurisdiction under Article 136 as a decree obtained by suppression or collusion cannot be executed against non-parties.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed with costs.

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed with costs assessed at Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only).