SUBODH KUMAR GUPTA versus SHRIKANT GUPTA AND ORS.

SUBODH KUMAR GUPTA versus SHRIKANT GUPTA AND ORS.

No part of the cause of action arose within the territorial jurisdiction of Chandigarh Court. Suit for dissolution of partnership and rendition of accounts must be filed where disputed acts occurred and the agreement was executed. Mere claim of a branch office at Chandigarh does not confer jurisdiction absent supporting facts.

Parties
Petitioner: Subodh Kumar Gupta; Respondent: Shrikant Gupta
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
19 August 1993
Procedural Posture
Special Leave Petition (civil) No. 10301 of 1993 / Supreme Court Appeal From Punjab & Haryana High Court in C.r. No. 1483/93
Outcome
Petition dismissed with costs.
Legal Topics
Territorial Jurisdiction, Dissolution of Partnership, Rendition of Accounts

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Subodh Kumar Gupta

Petitioner

Shrikant Gupta

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Special Leave Petition (civil) No. 10301 of 1993 / Supreme Court Appeal From Punjab & Haryana High Court in C.r. No. 1483/93

  1. 1 Whether Chandigarh Court has territorial jurisdiction in a suit for dissolution of partnership and rendition of accounts

Ratio Decidendi

No part of the cause of action arose within the territorial jurisdiction of Chandigarh Court. Suit for dissolution of partnership and rendition of accounts must be filed where disputed acts occurred and the agreement was executed. Mere claim of a branch office at Chandigarh does not confer jurisdiction absent supporting facts.

Court Disposition

Petition dismissed with costs.

Orders

  • Petition dismissed with costs quantified at Rs.10,000 to be paid in one set.
  • Plaint to be returned for presentation in a competent court.