SITARAMACHARYA (DEAD) THROUGH LRS. versus GURURAJACHARYA (DEAD) THROUGH LRS.
Admissions in the written statement in earlier proceedings, though not conclusive, in the absence of any reasonable and acceptable explanation, constitute strong evidence against the respondent, and the explanations offered were insufficient.
- Parties
- Appellant: SITARAMACHARYA (DEAD) THROUGH LRS.; Respondent: GURURAJACHARYA (DEAD) THROUGH LRS.
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 06 January 1997
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal Against High Court Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Admissions, Relevance and Evidentiary Value of Admissions, Declaration and Rendition of Accounts
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
SITARAMACHARYA (DEAD) THROUGH LRS.
Appellant
GURURAJACHARYA (DEAD) THROUGH LRS.
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal Against High Court Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Relevance and evidentiary value of admissions made in earlier proceedings under Sections 18 and 31 of Evidence Act
- 2 Whether respondent sufficiently explained admissions in earlier proceedings regarding ownership and funds
Ratio Decidendi
Admissions in the written statement in earlier proceedings, though not conclusive, in the absence of any reasonable and acceptable explanation, constitute strong evidence against the respondent, and the explanations offered were insufficient.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Judgment of High Court and appellate Court set aside
- Judgment of trial Court stands confirmed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment