SITIKANATHA MISHRA versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
Order of regularization applied to the appellant, deeming him regularized on the post of Professor from 27 January 1997; thus, he held substantive post as Professor and his claim for lien must be considered by the competent authority.
- Parties
- Appellant: SITIKANATHA MISHRA; Respondents: Union of India & Ors.
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 09 January 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Judgment and Order
- Outcome
- Appeals allowed; order of High Court set aside.
- Legal Topics
- Regularization, Lien, Substantive Appointment, Contractual Appointment
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
SITIKANATHA MISHRA
Appellant
Union of India & Ors.
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Judgment and Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant's appointment as Professor could be treated as regular from 27th January, 1997
- 2 Whether appointment to the post of Director on contractual basis had the effect of relinquishing lien to the post of Professor in absence of resignation or filling up of the post
Ratio Decidendi
Order of regularization applied to the appellant, deeming him regularized on the post of Professor from 27 January 1997; thus, he held substantive post as Professor and his claim for lien must be considered by the competent authority.
Court Disposition
Appeals allowed; order of High Court set aside.
Orders
- Competent authority to take fresh decision on appellant's claim of lien within four weeks from receipt of Supreme Court order.
- If lien is accepted, appellant's service to be treated as continuous for terminal benefits, leave of kind due, but no monetary benefits for period not served.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment