S.K KUSHWAHA versus D.K. JOSHI AND ORS.
To be eligible for selection as Principal, a candidate must ordinarily have one of the academic qualifications under clause (a) (either M.A. (Education) with B.Ed. or Master’s degree in any subject with M.Ed.) as well as a qualification under clause (b) (M.Phil degree or a recognised degree beyond Master’s level or published research work). Only if a candidate with both qualifications is unavailable or unsuitable may one possessing only (a) be appointed. Lacking M.Ed., appellant cannot claim under clause (c); Executive Council can relax the educational qualification but must do so with proper authority and reasoning.
- Parties
- Appellant: S.K. Kushwaha; Respondent: D.K. Joshi; Respondent: Kurukshetra University
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 18 March 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Punjab and Haryana High Court Decision in C.w.p. No. 1082 of 1999
- Outcome
- Judgment of High Court set aside; appeal allowed; matter remitted to High Court for fresh consideration
- Legal Topics
- Selection to the Post of Principal, Academic Qualifications, Relaxation of Qualifications, Interpretation of University Ordinance
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
S.K. Kushwaha
Appellant
D.K. Joshi
Respondent
Kurukshetra University
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Punjab and Haryana High Court Decision in C.w.p. No. 1082 of 1999
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether B.Ed. or M.Ed. qualification is essential for selection to the post of Principal of University College of Education
- 2 Whether such requirement could be relaxed and whether relaxation was actually exercised by the competent authority
Ratio Decidendi
To be eligible for selection as Principal, a candidate must ordinarily have one of the academic qualifications under clause (a) (either M.A. (Education) with B.Ed. or Master’s degree in any subject with M.Ed.) as well as a qualification under clause (b) (M.Phil degree or a recognised degree beyond Master’s level or published research work). Only if a candidate with both qualifications is unavailable or unsuitable may one possessing only (a) be appointed. Lacking M.Ed., appellant cannot claim under clause (c); Executive Council can relax the educational qualification but must do so with proper authority and reasoning.
Court Disposition
Judgment of High Court set aside; appeal allowed; matter remitted to High Court for fresh consideration
Orders
- Matter remitted to High Court for fresh consideration in light of declaration of law and observations made in this judgment
- No costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment