SMT. BHARATI REDDY versus THE STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ORS.
A voter of the Zilla Panchayat who is not a member cannot be denied an opportunity to challenge the election to the office of Adhyaksha under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution. Therefore, the writ petition filed by such voters before the High Court is maintainable, as the power of judicial review is a basic structure of the Constitution which cannot be ousted by statute or constitutional amendment.
- Parties
- Appellant: Smt. Bharatireddy; Respondents: The State of Karnataka and Ors.
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 17 August 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From Division Bench of High Court Remanding Writ Petition for Fresh Disposal
- Outcome
- Appeal disposed of; writ petition held maintainable.
- Legal Topics
- Judicial Review, Maintainability of Writ Petition, Panchayat Raj Elections
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Smt. Bharatireddy
Appellant
The State of Karnataka and Ors.
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From Division Bench of High Court Remanding Writ Petition for Fresh Disposal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a writ petition challenging the election of the Adhyaksha by voters who are not Zilla Panchayat members is maintainable in light of Article 243-O(b) of the Constitution.
Ratio Decidendi
A voter of the Zilla Panchayat who is not a member cannot be denied an opportunity to challenge the election to the office of Adhyaksha under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution. Therefore, the writ petition filed by such voters before the High Court is maintainable, as the power of judicial review is a basic structure of the Constitution which cannot be ousted by statute or constitutional amendment.
Court Disposition
Appeal disposed of; writ petition held maintainable.
Orders
- Learned Single Judge of High Court to dispose of the writ petition expeditiously, preferably within four weeks.
- Appellant permitted to function as Adhyaksha until disposal of writ petition; continuation subject to outcome.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment