SMT. BHATORI versus SMT. RAM PIARI

SMT. BHATORI versus SMT. RAM PIARI

The respondent, holding power of attorney, committed fraud by transferring the appellant's property to his wife. Such fraudulent contracts are void, and the appellant is entitled to declaration of title and other reliefs.

Source-derived case information.

Parties
Appellant: Smt. Bhatori; Respondent: Smt. Ram Piari
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
30 July 1996
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Decision on Appeal by Special Leave
Outcome
appeal allowed
Legal Topics
Fraudulent Transfer, Power of Attorney, Benami Transactions, Declaration of Title
Property Law Contract Law Civil Procedure Fraudulent Transfer Power of Attorney Benami Transactions Declaration of Title

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Smt. Bhatori

Appellant

Smt. Ram Piari

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Decision on Appeal by Special Leave

  1. 1 Whether the sale of the appellant's agricultural land by the power of attorney holder to his wife is void due to fraud
  2. 2 Whether the appellant is entitled to declaration of title and other reliefs due to the fraudulent transfer

Ratio Decidendi

The respondent, holding power of attorney, committed fraud by transferring the appellant's property to his wife. Such fraudulent contracts are void, and the appellant is entitled to declaration of title and other reliefs.

Court Disposition

appeal allowed

Orders

  • Judgments and decrees of courts below are set aside.
  • Suit decreed with exemplary costs throughout quantified at Rs. 10,000 at each stage including in Supreme Court.