SMT. ISHWARI DEVI versus SMT. SARLA DEVI AND ORS.
The sale deed executed by Churu Ram expressly and unequivocally conveyed the entire Anand Bhavan building, consisting of four flats, to the appellant. The mention of '4 biswas' in the deed was a clerical error based on revenue records, and did not limit the subject matter of the transfer. The entry of 3 biswas in Khasra No. 491 in the name of the vendor was manipulative and did not reflect true ownership or intention. Therefore, the appellant became owner of the entire property and title vested in her.
- Parties
- Appellant: SMT. ISHWARI DEVI; Respondent: SMT. SARLA DEVI; Respondent: Sant Ram; Respondent: Salig Ram; Respondent: Bali Ram; Respondent: Amogh Chand
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 14 December 1994
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Decision on Appeal From Himachal Pradesh High Court Judgment in R.s.a. No. 70 of 1994
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed. Orders of the First Appellate Court and High Court set aside.
- Legal Topics
- Transfer of Property, Interpretation of Sale Deeds, Title to Immovable Property, Eviction, Revenue Records
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
SMT. ISHWARI DEVI
Appellant
SMT. SARLA DEVI
Respondent
Sant Ram
Respondent
Salig Ram
Respondent
Bali Ram
Respondent
Amogh Chand
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Decision on Appeal From Himachal Pradesh High Court Judgment in R.s.a. No. 70 of 1994
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sale deed executed by Churu Ram in favour of the appellant transferred the entire Anand Bhavan building or only 4 biswas of Khasra No. 613
- 2 Effect of misdescription or ambiguity in area mentioned in the sale deed on the title of the appellant
Ratio Decidendi
The sale deed executed by Churu Ram expressly and unequivocally conveyed the entire Anand Bhavan building, consisting of four flats, to the appellant. The mention of '4 biswas' in the deed was a clerical error based on revenue records, and did not limit the subject matter of the transfer. The entry of 3 biswas in Khasra No. 491 in the name of the vendor was manipulative and did not reflect true ownership or intention. Therefore, the appellant became owner of the entire property and title vested in her.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed. Orders of the First Appellate Court and High Court set aside.
Orders
- Plaintiff's suit for declaration and injunction dismissed.
- Appellant entitled to costs throughout.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment