SMT. LAXMI DEVI versus SATYA NARAYAN AND ORS.

SMT. LAXMI DEVI versus SATYA NARAYAN AND ORS.

In the absence of proof of essential ceremonies ('Saptapadi'), the factum of second marriage under Section 494 IPC cannot be held to have been made out.

Parties
Appellant: Smt. Laxmi Devi; First Respondent: Satya Narayan; Respondent Advocate: B.S. Jain
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
09 August 1994
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Disposed
Outcome
Appeal disposed of
Legal Topics
Bigamy, Essential Ceremonies in Hindu Marriage, Compensation Under Article 142

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 8 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Smt. Laxmi Devi

Appellant

Satya Narayan

First Respondent

B.S. Jain

Respondent Advocate

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal Disposed

  1. 1 Whether the prosecution proved the essential ceremonies ('Saptapadi') to establish the factum of second marriage under Section 494 IPC.
  2. 2 Whether compensation can be awarded to the first wife under Article 142 of the Constitution when factum of second marriage is not proved.

Ratio Decidendi

In the absence of proof of essential ceremonies ('Saptapadi'), the factum of second marriage under Section 494 IPC cannot be held to have been made out.

Court Disposition

Appeal disposed of

Orders

  • Compensation of Rs. 25,000 awarded to appellant to be paid by the first respondent within eight weeks from the date of judgment.