SMT. MAINIA versus DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF CONSOLIDATION & OTHERS
Upon remarriage of a widow who inherited tenancy under section 35 of the United Provinces Tenancy Act, 1939, her interest in the holding is no longer as a widow of the deceased tenant but in her own right; continuous possession by her without any suit for ejectment brought within the limitation period converts her status into that of a hereditary tenant under section 180(2); succession to such interest, after her death, does not revert to the heirs of the first husband under section 172 read with section 171 of the Zamindari Abolition Act, but devolves upon her own son under section 174.
- Parties
- Appellant: Smt. Mainia; Respondents: Deputy Director of Consolidation & Others
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 04 August 1989
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal by Special Leave From a High Court Judgment in Writ Petition
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Succession to Tenancy Rights, Effect of Widow's Remarriage on Tenancy Succession, Operation of Limitation in Hereditary Tenancy
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Smt. Mainia
Appellant
Deputy Director of Consolidation & Others
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal by Special Leave From a High Court Judgment in Writ Petition
Legal Issues
- 1 What is the effect of a widow's remarriage on her tenancy interest under the United Provinces Tenancy Act, 1939?
- 2 Whether, after her remarriage, the widow's continued possession is as a widow of the earlier husband or in her own right?
- 3 How does succession devolve upon the death of the widow who inherited the tenancy as a widow and subsequently remarried, under relevant statutes?
Ratio Decidendi
Upon remarriage of a widow who inherited tenancy under section 35 of the United Provinces Tenancy Act, 1939, her interest in the holding is no longer as a widow of the deceased tenant but in her own right; continuous possession by her without any suit for ejectment brought within the limitation period converts her status into that of a hereditary tenant under section 180(2); succession to such interest, after her death, does not revert to the heirs of the first husband under section 172 read with section 171 of the Zamindari Abolition Act, but devolves upon her own son under section 174.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- No order as to costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment