SMT. RAJBIR KAUR & ANR. versus S. CHOKESIRI & CO.

SMT. RAJBIR KAUR & ANR. versus S. CHOKESIRI & CO.

Concurrent findings of exclusive possession and inferred monetary consideration by M/s Kwality Ice Cream were properly established; High Court erred by reassessing evidence and reversing findings in revision; conditions of sub-letting were met, entitling landlord to eviction.

Parties
Appellant: Smt. Rajbir Kaur; Respondent: S. Chokesiri & Co.
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
09 August 1988
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Decision on Special Leave Appeal
Outcome
Appeal allowed; eviction decree restored.
Legal Topics
Sub Letting, Lease Versus License, Exclusive Possession, Revisional Jurisdiction, Eviction
Tenancy Property Law Civil Procedure Sub Letting Lease Versus License Exclusive Possession Revisional Jurisdiction Eviction

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 9 Authorities cited 19 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Smt. Rajbir Kaur

Appellant

S. Chokesiri & Co.

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Decision on Special Leave Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the respondent-tenant had unauthorisedly sub-let portions of the demised premises
  2. 2 Whether the finding of exclusive possession was amenable to reversal in revision
  3. 3 Whether the agreement constituted a lease or license

Ratio Decidendi

Concurrent findings of exclusive possession and inferred monetary consideration by M/s Kwality Ice Cream were properly established; High Court erred by reassessing evidence and reversing findings in revision; conditions of sub-letting were met, entitling landlord to eviction.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed; eviction decree restored.

Orders

  • Order of the High Court set aside.
  • Order of eviction passed by Courts below restored.