SMT. SURASAIBALINI DEBI versus PHANINDRA MOHAN MAJUMDAR
Since the plaintiff's claim for possession was not based on enforcing an illegal agreement but on independent grounds dissociated from illegality, he was entitled to recover possession despite the benami nature and any tax evasion.
- Parties
- Appellant: Smt. Surasaibalini Debi; Respondent: Phanindra Mohan Majumdar
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 27 October 1964
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal by Special Leave From the Judgment and Decree of the Calcutta High Court
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Benami Transaction, Right to Possession, Income Tax Evasion, Enforcement of Title, Illegality and Enforcement of Contract
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Smt. Surasaibalini Debi
Appellant
Phanindra Mohan Majumdar
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal by Special Leave From the Judgment and Decree of the Calcutta High Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a benami transaction entered to circumvent service rules and evade income-tax invalidates the owner's right to recover possession.
- 2 Whether the Courts can assist a party to enforce rights emerging out of a transaction tainted with illegality.
Ratio Decidendi
Since the plaintiff's claim for possession was not based on enforcing an illegal agreement but on independent grounds dissociated from illegality, he was entitled to recover possession despite the benami nature and any tax evasion.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Plaintiff is entitled to recover possession from the defendant.
- Costs as proposed by the learned brother.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment