SURESH RAGHO DESAI & ANR. versus SMT. VIJAYA VINAYAK GHAG & ANR.

Challenge to unreasoned award not sustainable as parties participated in proceedings, no objection was taken at the time of the award, and there was no violation of principles of natural justice or miscarriage of justice.

Source-derived case information.

Parties: Petitioner: Suresh Ragho Desai; Respondent: Smt. Vijaya Vinayak Ghag
Jurisdiction: India
Judgment Date: 29 August 1988
Procedural Posture: Special Leave Petition (civil) / Final Disposal
Outcome: Petition dismissed
Legal Topics: Unreasoned Award, Principles of Natural Justice, Article 136 Constitution

Arbitration Unreasoned Award Principles of Natural Justice Article 136 Constitution

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2

Parties

Suresh Ragho Desai

Petitioner

Smt. Vijaya Vinayak Ghag

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Special Leave Petition (civil) / Final Disposal

Legal Issues

1 Whether an unreasoned arbitration award is valid and sustainable.
2 Whether there was violation of principles of natural justice or miscarriage of justice.

Ratio Decidendi

Court Disposition

Petition dismissed

Orders

Special Leave Petition is dismissed.

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.