SOBHA HYMAVATHI DEVI versus SETTI GANGADHARA SWAMY AND ORS.
A candidate can avail reservation for a constituency reserved for Scheduled Tribes only if they are a member of a Scheduled Tribe by birth, not by marriage or acquired status. The presumption of marriage from long cohabitation is not rebutted here; the appellant's father was of a forward caste and her mother of Scheduled Tribe, making her forward caste. Marrying a Scheduled Tribe member does not confer eligibility to contest as a Scheduled Tribe candidate. Community certificates under Andhra Pradesh Act 1993 are not binding for Legislative Assembly elections and can be independently scrutinized.
- Parties
- Appellant: Sobha Hyma v Athi Devi; Respondents: Setti Gangadhara Swamy and Ors.
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 28 January 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal From Andhra Pradesh High Court Judgment on Election Petition
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Reservation for Scheduled Tribes, Caste Status for Electoral Qualification, Validity of Community Certificate, Representation of the People Act
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Sobha Hyma v Athi Devi
Appellant
Setti Gangadhara Swamy and Ors.
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal From Andhra Pradesh High Court Judgment on Election Petition
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant belonged to a Scheduled Tribe and was qualified to contest from a reserved constituency under Article 332 of the Constitution of India
- 2 Whether the appellant, born to a forward caste father and Scheduled Tribe mother, is entitled to the caste of her mother
- 3 Whether acquired membership by marriage to a Scheduled Tribe confers eligibility for reservation
Ratio Decidendi
A candidate can avail reservation for a constituency reserved for Scheduled Tribes only if they are a member of a Scheduled Tribe by birth, not by marriage or acquired status. The presumption of marriage from long cohabitation is not rebutted here; the appellant's father was of a forward caste and her mother of Scheduled Tribe, making her forward caste. Marrying a Scheduled Tribe member does not confer eligibility to contest as a Scheduled Tribe candidate. Community certificates under Andhra Pradesh Act 1993 are not binding for Legislative Assembly elections and can be independently scrutinized.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Election of the appellant to the Andhra Pradesh Legislative Assembly is declared invalid.
- High Court decision is confirmed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment